7
$\begingroup$

We say a function $f: \mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R$ is essentially continuous if for every $x \in \mathbb R^n$, we have

$$\lim_{\delta \to 0_+} \text{esssup}_{y, z \in B_\delta (x)} |f(y) - f(z)| = 0,$$

where the essential supremum is taken with respect to the product Lebesgue measure.

Question: Let $f$ be essentially continuous. Does there necessarily exist some classically continuous function $f^{\ast}$ that agrees Lebesgue almost everywhere with $f$?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

I mean sure. First, for each $x$ the essential limit of $f(y), y\to x$ exists, because for each $\delta$ we get an interval of potential values (between essinf and esssup), these intervals shrink by assumption, hence the limit exists as the intersection point of these intervals. Call this function $f^*(x)$. We need to show that this function is continuous and $f(x) = f^*(x)$ a.e.

For the first one, for arbitrary $x$ and $\varepsilon > 0$ the interval for $x$ contains the intervals for all points at most $\varepsilon$ away from $x$, so the limiting value for them as well, and since these intervals shrink when $\varepsilon \to 0$, we get continuity.

For the second one, if not then there is $\delta > 0$ such that $|f(x)-f^*(x)| > \delta$ on a compact set of positive measure. This set has a Lebesgue point $x$, say, in the vicinity of which we have a bigger and bigger intersection, in particular it is always of positive measure. But this contradicts already proven facts that $f$ has essential limit $f^*(x)$ at $x$ and $f^*$ is continuous there, so $f^*(y)$ tends to the same limit.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Never mind my previous comment, I worked out the implication in the last paragraph. Thanks for the answer! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12 at 20:56
9
$\begingroup$

Denote by $f_{\delta}(x) = \frac{1}{|B_{\delta}(x)|} \int_{B_{\delta}(x)} f$ the scale $\delta$ mean of $f$ centered at $x$.

Let $\epsilon > 0$, then there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $$ \operatorname{esssup}_{y,z\in B_{\delta}(x)} |f(y) - f(z)| < \epsilon \tag{E}$$ Given $\delta_1, \delta_2 < \delta$, we can take averages over $y\in B_{\delta_1}(x)$ and $z\in B_{\delta_2}(x)$, to find $$ | f_{\delta_1}(x) - f_{\delta_2}(x) | < \epsilon $$ This shows that as $\delta\to 0$ the net $f_\delta(x)$ is Cauchy, and hence converges. Let

$$ g(x) = \lim_{\delta\to 0} f_{\delta}(x) $$

I claim that $g$ is continuous.

Let $\epsilon > 0$, and $\delta > 0$ such that (E) holds. For $y \in B_{\delta}(x)$, choose $\delta'$ such that $B_{\delta'}(y)\subseteq B_{\delta}(x)$ and $|f_{\delta'}(y) - g(y)| < \epsilon$. Choose $\delta'' < \delta$ such that $|f_{\delta''}(x) - g(x)| < \epsilon$. Then

$$ |g(x) - g(y)| \leq |f_{\delta'}(y) - f_{\delta''}(x)| + |g(y) - f_{\delta'}(y)| + |g(x) - f_{\delta''}(x)| < 3 \epsilon$$

The latter two terms are $ < \epsilon$ by convergence of $f_{\delta}$ to $g$. The first term is $<\epsilon$ because it is obtained by averaging (E), and that $B_{\delta'}(y)$ and $B_{\delta''}(x)$ are both contained in $B_{\delta}(x)$ by assumption.

Finally, we have that $g = f$ a.e. by Lebesgue differentiation.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Oh, so the Lebesgue averages work as well. Nice! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12 at 20:56
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is basically the quantified version of the other answer. I wanted to write it out since I was worried about commuting limits (for the proof of continuity). $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12 at 20:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.