Skip to main content

Questions tagged [truth-conditional-semantics]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
4 votes
1 answer
132 views

Good evening, everyone. Since Frege the meaning of sentences has been conditioned to its truth-condition (be it as a truth-value being the referent of a sentence or truth being a property of a true ...
rutabulum's user avatar
  • 399
8 votes
1 answer
175 views

As I understand it there are systems of formal logic that do not admit vacuous truth for universal statements, what known systems of formal logic satisfy this constraint? An example Kripke as I ...
user254694's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
129 views

On the issue of Underdetermination, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy mentions that “Quine suggested that such challenges applied not only to the confirmation of all types of scientific theories,...
Mikael Jensen's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
70 views

Let me use this notation: "xxx"(OL) means that "xxx" is a proposition in the Object Language; "xxx"(ML) means that "xxx" is a proposition in the Meta-Language. ...
Marco Disce's user avatar
6 votes
9 answers
5k views

In relation to his possible worlds analysis of natural language conditionals (e.g. 1975 Indicative Conditionals) Robert Stalnaker posited a function which takes an antecedent proposition and a ...
Araucaria - Not here any more.'s user avatar
1 vote
5 answers
285 views

The answer to this is a philosophy of logic question would seem to unify the notion of analytic truth across all formal and natural languages. This subject of this question seems to refer to the ...
polcott's user avatar
  • 521
1 vote
1 answer
178 views

I thought I had a grasp on this. Do Gödel's apply to just math; logic, too; or more, and what does its applicability entail? If it applies to math, does it apply to physics? Similarly with Tarski: can ...
Sayetsu's user avatar
  • 151
0 votes
0 answers
48 views

Let 𝒜 = an actuality operator and √→ be demi-if. Which, if any, of the following conversions would go through? 𝒜A √→ 𝒜B = √𝒜A → √𝒜B 𝒜A √→ 𝒜B = √𝒜A → 𝒜B 𝒜A √→ 𝒜B = 𝒜A → √𝒜B 𝒜A √→ 𝒜B = √�...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
128 views

So the definition of truth is that p is true if and only if p. However, since the Liar Paradox states that p is true if and only if p is false, this is a contradiction. So the words truth and falsity ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
3 votes
5 answers
182 views

I recently read this article in my pursuit to understand what alethic nihlism is trying to say: https://philarchive.org/archive/ASASIT One of the objections to alethic nihlism is that alethic nihlism ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
161 views

What are the similiarities and differences between the two theories (as well as arguments for and counterarguments against). From what I know, trivialism states that everything is true (and I believe ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
641 views

It seems fairly obvious. Even a five year old could probably come up with it. Its obvious that if something is the case, it is true (literally synonyms). So, am I missing something? Is there a gulf ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
3 votes
4 answers
227 views

I read the article “On the Advantages of Believing that Nothing is True”. I just don't understand how someone can believe something is the case, but is not true. It's like saying you believe unmarried ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
96 views

I tried Googling "demi-possibility demi-negation" and got nothing (just "demi-possibility" gave results mostly related to demisexuality). And my analysis of demi-negation didn't ...
user avatar
-1 votes
6 answers
4k views

Is the whole question like "what is truth" just about finding definitions to things we know but can't put into words to explain (things that are currently ineffable). For example, everyone ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
529 views

I recently came across this reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/15chen5/comment/jtwnkkw/ I think it has something to do with denying the truth predicate without denying the ...
HelpMePlease's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
105 views

My question is in regard to a problem (albeit a simple one) that I ran into reading Tarski's paper "Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages". On page 159 Tarski states: (5) for all p, ‘p' ...
Max Maxman's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
174 views

There is a reasoning in mathematical logic which is meant to prove that the horseshoe is the only logical operation which fits our notion of conditional. The reasoning starts from the idea that the ...
Speakpigeon's user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
512 views

I recall reading several philosophical articles which deal with various types of untruths: lies, misrepresentations, contradictions, omissions, confabulations, delusions, hallucinations, apparitions, ...
Corbin's user avatar
  • 1,751
4 votes
2 answers
351 views

I am a little bit surprised by the principle of composionality in semantics (I'm very new to all of this), which states that the meaning of a complex expression is determined by the meanings of its ...
DSP's user avatar
  • 113
2 votes
1 answer
87 views

As an umbrella term, "structuralism" has to cover realist and nonrealist versions, while also carrying through the theme of its name nontrivially (for there is a trivial way to make ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
53 views

I understand that for the consequent to really follow from the antecedent, it (the consequent) must be both relevant and necessary given the antecedent. So my question is: which types of conditional ...
help-me's user avatar
  • 97
0 votes
1 answer
82 views

Is that correct to say that semantic consequence is equivalent to the concept of sound argument in classical propositional logic? If it is the case, arguments or theories with contradictory premises ...
Cesar Tacla's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
435 views

According to SEP, Lewis's theory of counterfactual conditionals defines truth for counterfactuals as follows: [...] the truth condition for the counterfactual “If A were (or had been) the case, C ...
Rainer_Zoufal's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
110 views

Consider the statement "This triangle has radius 3" and the statement "This cat is a chihuahua". Both radius and chihuahua are terms defined for different kind of objects than the objects we are ...
Antonios Sarikas's user avatar
23 votes
11 answers
23k views

Law of Excluded Middle: In logic, the law of excluded middle (or the principle of excluded middle) is the third of the so-called three classic laws of thought. It states that for any proposition, ...
Tames's user avatar
  • 1,027