0

  1. One group was taxed a Benjamin if they didn't do X, and the second was given a bonus of the same amount for doing X.

  2. One group was taxed $100 if they didn't do X, and the second was given a bonus for the same amount if they did X.

I guess both options are valid but I'm wonderig which one is more natural to (mostly) American eyes.

Improve this question
0

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2

Well, firstly, being taxed "a Benjamin" is highly colloquial, in case you're not aware of that.

As for "for" vs. "of", "of" is much more correct to me. I'm not even sure if "for" is correct at all.

Improve this answer
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.