0

Oxford Learners Dictionary along with others defines "soloist" as:

soloist(noun): a musician or singer who performs a solo. "he appears as a concerto soloist with all the great British orchestras"

I'm surprised by the use of the indefinite article before solo which means it's a noun that means:

solo(noun): a piece or passage of vocal or instrumental music for one performer. "a blistering guitar solo" (Oxford Learners Dictionary)

But I know that a soloist is someone who performs alone on stage. This is confirmed by the Longman Dictionary's definition:

soloist(noun): a musician who performs alone or plays an instrument alone cello soloist Yo Yo Ma

Based on Longman's definition the Oxford Learner's definition should be "a musician or singer who performs solo" in which case "solo" is an adverb which means:

solo(noun): for or by one person alone. "she'd spent most of her life flying solo" (Oxford Languages)

Or maybe a soloist is both someone who performs alone on stage and someone who plays a solo during a concert performed by more musicians?

Edit: I noticed the dislike for my post and started to investigate more and found this definition:

solo (noun) 2. A performance by a single singer or instrumentalist. (American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language)

I guess this is the meaning here.

8
  • 4
    "I know that a soloist is someone who performs alone on stage." How do you know that? How are you sure that you are right and other dictionaries are wrong? Most words can be used in multiple ways with slightly varying meanings (maybe a choir uses the word differently to an orchestra and both differ from a rock or jazz band, for instance) and "soloist" is no different. You seem to believe in a precision which does not exist: how far away does somebody have to be from an orchestra before you will class them as a "soloist"? Commented Nov 6, 2024 at 16:38
  • 1
    If you have a question particularly related to musical terminology, you should probably ask on Music SE rather than here. Commented Nov 6, 2024 at 16:40
  • 3
    Exactly. A solo can be either a performance by a single artist or a passage in a more complex work which showcases one of the performers. Commented Nov 6, 2024 at 17:22
  • 3
    I recently sang in a performance of Mendelsohn's Elijah. As well as the choir and the orchestra, there were four soloists. None of them was ever alone on stage. Commented Nov 6, 2024 at 17:25
  • 1
    In many music performances, the other musicians will be playing along with the soloist too. It's not exactly 'on their own' but an accompaniment, although they are doing 'a solo'. Commented Nov 6, 2024 at 21:13

4 Answers 4

3

A soloist, as the dictionary tells you, is someone who performs a solo. Just as a novelist is someone who writes novels, not someone who is novel. Cambridge explains that the suffix -ist primarily denotes "one that performs a (specified) action".

The most common term for someone who performs solo is a solo artist.

I did a quick bit of research and there are a few, rare examples of 'solo' musicians being called soloists, but I would consider them to be outliers. For example, Smithsonian Music referred to Louis Armstrong as a soloist, and while he was known as a 'solo artist' who sang and played trumpet, he never or rarely performed without a band, and his trumpet playing was usually "a solo". If this is an acceptable second usage of the word, it seems rare, and debatable as to wether it still doesn't retain the dictionary definition.

1
  • You can perform solo once or occasionally and not be "a solo artist" Commented Nov 6, 2024 at 22:15
0

A soloist is a) an instrumentalist or vocalist who performs alone unaccompanied by others, in their professional capacity as "solo artist" or b) an instrumentalist or vocalist who performs a passage of a piece alone while in the company of other instrumentalists or vocalists who have been performing as a group prior to the solo passage and who will recommence performing as a group when the solo passage is finished.

The performance itself of a passage alone as a sole instrumentalist or vocalist is often called "a solo" or "the solo", a shortened form of "solo performance".

0

There's a bit of history involved. For some musical practices and traditions, a single person with an instrument is the norm, like a griot with a kora or Homer with a lyre. But others have traditions involving ensembles. For these, a "solo" part is "alone" (Italian literal meaning of the word) in the sense that there is only one person performing that musical part, even if others are performing others at the same time.

Thus a choir of many singers can also feature a vocal soloist. There may be five or fifty sopranos all singing the choral soprano part, but the soprano soloist is the only person singing their musical part. Similarly there may be a cello concerto with a symphony orchestra; there may be a dozen cellists in the orchestra, all playing the same orchestral cello part, but the solo cellist is the only one playing their special part.

This usage was then borrowed by settings that are normally "one-on-a-part" anyway. For instance, a jazz trio of piano, drums, and bass might play together, then the bassist might "take a solo," a period in which their instrument is featured more prominently and is the focus of attention, more so than the other instruments. The piano and drums might keep playing during this solo, but less prominently. This usage might be the most counter-intuitive, since the bassist is the only person playing the bass part throughout the whole show, and is no more "alone" during their solo than at other times, but the term has been borrowed from other large-ensemble examples like the choir or symphony. (In fact, in a jazz "big band," there could well be multiples of an instrument. Like, there might be four trumpets who all play the same part together, but then one trumpeter "takes a solo" and is playing different musical material (most likely the other three take a rest!).)

0

perform solo and perform a solo are two different things though they are related.

A soloist performs solo OR performs a solo.

a solo performance means the musician or singer alone.

perform solo means without other musicians.

perform a solo means perform on one's own but with musicians waiting to play in an orchestra after the solo finishes.

So, they both mean the musician or singer performs alone, but the second means with other musicians or an orchestra waiting to play.

There are many different kinds of solos:

  • piano solo, violin solo, etc.

Also, the OP posted this:

soloist(noun): a musician or singer who performs a solo. "he appears as a concerto soloist with all the great British orchestras"

and was surprised by the indefinite article.

Right, let's compare a and the here:

a musician or singer who performs the solo etc. would mean that the overall musical work has a solo piece and the musician performed that specifically.

The indefinite article a is used to express a generality. That dictionary defintion is a generality, thus, the article is right.

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.