In the textbook “Forecasting: Principles and Practice (3rd ed)”, at https://otexts.com/fpp3/transformations.html , I see:
“3.1 Transformations and adjustments ...
Mathematical transformations
If the [time series] data shows variation that increases or decreases with the level of the series, then a transformation can be useful. ...
A useful family of transformations, that includes both logarithms and power transformations, is the family of Box-Cox transformations (Box & Cox, 1964), which depend on the parameter λ ...
The guerrero feature (Guerrero, 1993) can be used to choose a value of lambda for you.”
Q. Why do the authors use the Guerrero method, rather than the maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method (or some other method)?
Q. When the goal is to stabilize the variance of a time series, what are the pros and cons of various methods (Guerrero, MLE, others)?
(Here is the R documentation for feasts:guerrerostrong text guerrero {feasts}, Guerrero's method for Box Cox lambda selection https://search.r-project.org/CRAN/refmans/feasts/html/guerrero.html)