Skip to main content

Questions tagged [principia-mathematica]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
1 answer
121 views

Does Russell’s notion of typical ambiguity involve equivocation? I ask because Solomon Feferman notes the following: “The first place that the issue of ambiguity comes up is on pg. 251 or pg.174. For ...
Lorenzo Gil Badiola's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
82 views

Are properties and sets of the same type in Russell’s theory of types? I ask because of the following, if properties and sets were of different types then the following would hold: For all properties ...
Lorenzo Gil Badiola's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
119 views

Can you hold the axiom of unrestricted comprehension under Russell's theory of types? I ask because of the following: Assume Russell’s theory of types. Then consider the following: For all X if X is a ...
Lorenzo Gil Badiola's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
66 views

What do the symbols 1, 2, 3, 4, … mean in Russell’s theory of types? I ask because of the following. Consider the symbol 1. It can signify the object 1 of type zero. It can signify the set with only ...
Lorenzo Gil Badiola's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
262 views

Preliminaries: The way I understand it, Gödel took Russel's and Whitehead's Principia Mathematica (PM) and mapped strings of symbols from PM onto the integers, their Gödel numbers. He then constructed,...
Johannes Bauer's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
122 views

Some years ago I read somewhere a memoir by Bertrand Russell. He wrote about the difficulties he encountered in writing Principia Mathematica (or trying to solve the paradox that bears his name). He ...
PierreVanStulov's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
239 views

I am placing this question on philosophy stack exchange because a mathematician wouldn't care, and a physicist would be extremely insulted. Consider Newton's Law F=ma. First, I am observing this as ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
444 views

So, from what little I have read (such as this answer), it appears to be that one reason why the program of Logicism, as laid out in the Principia Mathematica, failed was that its goals (of finding a ...
J.M.W Turner's user avatar
2 votes
4 answers
857 views

While explaining why a function cannot take itself as an argument, I realize that the vicious-circle principle says nothing about why a function cannot take one of its values as argument. The ...
George Chen's user avatar
  • 2,278
6 votes
1 answer
951 views

I've read a lot about Russell and other Logicism advocates and their trial to reduce math to logic. But what does that mean? We know that all known mathematics can be reduced to Set theory, is that ...
FNH's user avatar
  • 450
5 votes
1 answer
225 views

In Linsky's The Evolution of Principia Mathematica it is written, Chapter 6 studies in detail the content of Appendix B, On induction. The appendix consists of a technical proof that even without ...
user avatar