38
$\begingroup$

Assume that $f_1\colon V_1\to W_1, f_2\colon V_2\to W_2$ are $k$-linear maps between $k$-vector spaces (over the same field $k$, but the dimension may be infinity). Then the tensor product $f_1\otimes f_2\colon V_1\otimes V_2\to W_1\otimes W_2$ is defined, and it's obvious that $\ker f_1\otimes V_2+ V_1\otimes \ker f_2 \subseteq \ker (f_1\otimes f_2)$. My question is whether the relation $\subseteq$ is in fact $=$.

If this does not hold, how about assuming all these vector spaces are commutative associated $k$-algebras with identity and that all the maps are $k$-algebra homomorphisms? Or can you give a "right" form of the kernel $\ker (f_1\otimes f_2)$?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ You cannot form the tensor product of two vector spaces unless they are vector spaces over the same field. Also, a linear map (or a $K$-homomorphism) of two vector spaces has to commute with the scalars, so it is necessary to assume that $W_i, V_i$ are in fact vector spaces over the same field $K$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2013 at 14:56
  • $\begingroup$ Of course, I will make it clear now! $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 27, 2013 at 14:58

3 Answers 3

44
$\begingroup$

Yes, that's true. Let $f_i : V_i \to W_i$ be two linear maps. Since $\mathrm{im}(f_1) \otimes \mathrm{im}(f_2)$ embeds into $W_1 \otimes W_2$, we may assume that $f_1,f_2$ are surjective. But then they are split, so that we can assume that $V_i = W_i \oplus U_i$ and that $f_i$ equals the projection $V_i \to W_i$, with kernel $U_i$. Then $V_1 \otimes V_2 = W_1 \otimes W_2 \oplus W_1 \otimes U_2 \oplus U_1 \otimes W_2 \oplus U_1 \otimes U_2$ and $f_1 \otimes f_2$ equals the projection of $V_1 \otimes V_2$ onto $W_1 \otimes W_2$. Hence the kernel is $W_1 \otimes U_2 \oplus U_1 \otimes W_2 \oplus U_1 \otimes U_2 = U_1 \otimes V_2 + V_1 \otimes U_2$.

This shows even more: The kernel is the pushout $(\ker(f_1) \otimes V_2) \cup_{\ker(f_1) \otimes \ker(f_2)} (V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2))$.

By the way, this argument is purely formal and works in every semisimple abelian $\otimes$-category. What happens when we drop semisimplicity, for example when we consider modules over some commutative ring $R$? Then we only need some flatness assumptions:

Let $f_1 : V_1 \to W_1$ and $f_2 : V_2 \to W_2$ be two morphisms in an abelian $\otimes$-category (for example $R$-linear maps between $R$-modules). If $f_1,f_2$ are epimorphisms, then we have exact sequences $\ker(f_1) \to V_1 \to W_1 \to 0$ and $\ker(f_2) \to V_2 \to W_2 \to 0$. Applying the right exactness of the tensor product twice(!), we get that then also

$\ker(f_1) \otimes V_2 \oplus V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2) \to V_1 \otimes V_2 \to W_1 \otimes W_2 \to 0$

is exact. If $f_1,f_2$ are not epi, we can still apply the above to their images and get the exactness of

$\ker(f_1) \otimes V_2 \oplus V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2) \to V_1 \otimes V_2 \to \mathrm{im}(f_1) \otimes \mathrm{im}(f_2) \to 0.$

Now assume that $\mathrm{im}(f_1)$ and $W_2$ are flat. Then $\mathrm{im}(f_1) \otimes \mathrm{im}(f_2)$ embeds into $\mathrm{im}(f_1) \otimes W_2$ which embeds into $W_1 \otimes W_2$. Hence, we have still that the sequence

$\ker(f_1) \otimes V_2 \oplus V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2) \to V_1 \otimes V_2 \to W_1 \otimes W_2$

is exact. In other words, we have a sum decomposition $$\ker(f_1 \otimes f_2) = \alpha(\ker(f_1) \otimes V_2) + \beta(V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2)),$$ where $\alpha : \ker(f_1) \otimes V_2 \to V_1 \otimes V_2$ and $\beta : V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2) \to V_1 \otimes V_2$ are the canonical morphisms. In general, these are not monic! However, this is the case, by definition, when $V_1$ and $V_2$ are flat. So in this case we can safely treat $\alpha$ and $\beta$ as inclusions and write $$\ker(f_1 \otimes f_2) = V_1 \otimes \ker(f_2) + \ker(f_1) \otimes V_2.$$

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you very very much! You are so great! $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2013 at 1:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin Brandenburg: First of all, a great answer. However, isn't it enough to assume flatness of $W_1$,$W_2$,$im(f_1)$ and $im(f_2)$? The step that $\alpha:ker(f_1) \otimes V_2 \rightarrow V_1 \otimes V_2$ is injective seems to always hold if $W_1$ and $W_2$ are flat (by using the tor-functors). Maybe I've missed something here, but it seems to be the case. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 12, 2014 at 15:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you flesh out a bit what you mean by "applying the right exactness of the tensor product (twice!)"? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 21, 2017 at 6:27
  • $\begingroup$ @EricAuld: See Lemma 3.1.20 in arxiv.org/pdf/1410.1716.pdf for instance (applied to $\mathcal{C}=\mathrm{Vect}(k)$). $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 12, 2017 at 11:39
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @EricAuld - by right exactness of $-\otimes V_2$, we have $\ker f_1\otimes V_2\rightarrow V_1\otimes V_2\rightarrow W_1\otimes V_2\rightarrow 0$ exact, in particular the kernel of $V_1\otimes V_2\rightarrow W_1\otimes V_2$ is the image of $\ker f_1\otimes V_2$ in $V_1\otimes V_2$. Meanwhile (by similar logic), right exactness of $W_1\otimes -$ implies the kernel of $W_1\otimes V_2\rightarrow W_1\otimes W_2$ is the image of $W_1\otimes \ker f_2$ in $W_1\otimes V_2$. Now $f_1\otimes f_2$ is the composed map $V_1\otimes V_2 \rightarrow W_1\otimes V_2 \rightarrow W_1\otimes W_2$. Its kernel is the $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 26, 2021 at 3:47
3
$\begingroup$

When $f_1$ and $f_2$ are surjective

Constructing an isomorphism

Suppose first that $f_1$ and $f_2$ are surjective, and that we are working over an arbitrary commutative ring $𝕜$. We may assume that $f_i$ is the canonical quotient map from $V_i$ to $V_i / U_i$ for a submodule $U_i$ of $V_i$. By abuse of notation, we denote by $U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2$ the resulting submodule of $V_1 ⊗ V_2$, even if the homomorphisms from $U_1 ⊗ V_2$ and $V_1 ⊗ U_2$ to $V_1 ⊗ V_2$ are not injective. The submodule $U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2$ of $V_1 ⊗ V_2$ lies in the kernel of $f_1 ⊗ f_2$, whence we get an induced homomorphism of $𝕜$-modules $$ φ \colon (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \to (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2) \,, \quad [v_1 ⊗ v_2] \mapsto [v_1] ⊗ [v_2] \,. $$ We want to show that $φ$ is an isomorphism. This can be done in multiple ways.

  1. We can construct an inverse $ψ$ to $φ$ as follows. For every element $v_2$ of $V_2$, the composite $$ λ_{v_1} \colon V_1 \to V_1 ⊗ V_2 \to (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \,, \quad v_1 \mapsto v_1 ⊗ v_2 \mapsto [v_1 ⊗ v_2] $$ is $𝕜$-linear and contains $U_2$ in its kernel. We get therefore an induced $𝕜$-linear map. $$ λ'_{v_1} \colon V_1 / U_1 \to (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \,, \quad [v_1] \mapsto [v_1 ⊗ v_2] \,. $$ For every element $[v_1]$ of $V / U_1$ we have thus the well-defined map $$ ρ_{[v_1]} \colon V_2 \to (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \,, \quad v_2 \mapsto λ'_{[v_1]}(v_2) = [v_1 ⊗ v_2] \,. $$ This map is $𝕜$-linear and contains $U_2$ in its kernel, and therefore induces a well-defined $𝕜$-linear map $$ ρ'_{[v_1]} \colon V_2 / U_2 \to (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \,, \quad [v_2] \mapsto [v_1 ⊗ v_2] \,. $$ We have altogether a well-defined map \begin{align*} (V_1 / U_1) × (V_2 / U_2) &\to (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \,, \\ ([v_1], [v_2]) &\mapsto ρ'_{[v_1]}([v_2]) = [v_1 ⊗ v_2] \,. \end{align*} This map is $𝕜$-bilinear, and therefore induces the desired $𝕜$-linear map $$ ψ \colon (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2) \to (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2) \,, \quad [v_1] ⊗ [v_2] \mapsto [v_1 ⊗ v_2] \,. $$

  2. Let $T$ be another $𝕜$-module. Any $𝕜$-bilinear map from $β$ from $(V_1 / U_1) × (V_2 / U_2)$ to $T$ can be pulled back to a $𝕜$-bilinear map from $α$ from $V_1 × V_2$ to $T$, given by $α(v_1, v_2) = β([v_1], [v_2])$. This bilinear map $α$ satisfies $α(v_1, v_2) = 0$ whenever $v_1$ is contained in $U_1$ or $v_2$ is contained in $U_2$.

    Suppose conversely that $α$ is any $𝕜$-bilinear map from $V_1 × V_2$ to $T$ such that $α(v_1, v_2) = 0$ whenever $v_1$ is contained in $U_1$ or $v_2$ is contained in $U_2$. For all $v_1, v'_1 ∈ V_1$ and $v_2, v'_2 ∈ V_2$ with $v_1 - v'_1 ∈ U_1$ and $v_2 - v'_2 ∈ U_2$ we then have \begin{align*} α(v_1, v_2) &= α(v'_1 + v_1 - v'_1, v'_2 + v_2 - v'_2) \\ &= α(v'_1, v'_2) + \underbrace{ α(v'_1, v_2 - v'_2) }_{= 0} + \underbrace{ α(v_1 - v'_1, v'_2) }_{= 0} + \underbrace{ α(v_1 - v'_1, v_2 - v'_2) }_{= 0} \\ &= α(v'_1, v'_2) \,. \end{align*} This shows that $α$ descends to a well-defined map $β$ from $(V_1 / U_1) × (V_2 / U_2)$ to $T$, which is then again bilinear. (We could also prove this by using the universal properties of $V_1 / U_1$ and $V_2 / U_2$, similar to how we have constructed the inverse $ψ$ before.) We have thus constructed an isomorphism \begin{align*} {}& \mathrm{Bilin}(V_1 / U_1 , V_2 / U_2 ;\, T) \\ ≅{}& \{ α ∈ \mathrm{Bilin}(V_1, V_2;\, T) \mid \text{$α(v_1, v_2) = 0$ whenever $v_1 ∈ U_1$ or $v_2 ∈ U_2$} \} \,. \end{align*} It follows that \begin{align*} {}& \mathrm{Hom}((V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2), T) \\ ≅{}& \mathrm{Bilin}(V_1 / U_1 , V_2 / U_2 ;\, T) \\ ≅{}& \{ α ∈ \mathrm{Bilin}(V_1, V_2;\, T) \mid \text{$α(v_1, v_2) = 0$ whenever $v_1 ∈ U_1$ or $v_2 ∈ U_2$} \} \\ ≅{}& \{ f ∈ \mathrm{Hom}(V_1 ⊗ V_2, T) \mid \text{$f(v_1 ⊗ v_2) = 0$ whenever $v_1 ∈ U_1$ or $v_2 ∈ U_2$} \} \\ ≅{}& \{ f ∈ \mathrm{Hom}(V_1 ⊗ V_2, T) \mid \text{$f(x) = 0$ whenever $x ∈ U_1 ⊗ V_2$ or $x ∈ V_1 ⊗ U_2$} \} \\ ≅{}& \{ f ∈ \mathrm{Hom}(V_1 ⊗ V_2, T) \mid \text{$f(x) = 0$ for all $x ∈ U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2$} \} \\ ≅{}& \mathrm{Hom}((V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2), T) \,. \end{align*} By writing out these isomorphisms, we see that it is given (from top to bottom) by the induced homomorphism $φ^*$. It follows from Yoneda’s lemma (or more precisely from the fully faithfulness of the Yoneda embedding) that $φ$ is an isomorphism.

  3. We could also combine both approaches: we use the isomorphism \begin{align*} {}& \mathrm{Hom}((V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2), T) \\ ≅{}& \{ α ∈ \mathrm{Bilin}(V_1, V_2;\, T) \mid \text{$α(v_1, v_2) = 0$ whenever $v_1 ∈ U_1$ or $v_2 ∈ U_2$} \} \end{align*} for $T = (V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_1 + V_1 ⊗ U_2)$ to easily construct $ψ$ as the homomorphism corresponding to the bilinear map $(v_1, v_2) \mapsto [v_1 ⊗ v_2]$.

We find in either case that $φ$ is an isomorphism because both $(V_1 ⊗ V_2) / (U_1 ⊗ V_1 + U_2 ⊗ V_1)$ and $(V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2)$ have suitable universal properties.

Diagram chase

We know that tensoring is right exact. We get therefore the following commutative diagram with exact rows and exact columns: $$ \require{AMScd} \begin{CD} U_1 ⊗ U_2 @>>> V_1 ⊗ U_2 @>>> (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ U_2 @>>> 0 \\ @VVV @VVV @VVV \\ U_1 ⊗ V_2 @>>> V_1 ⊗ V_2 @>>> (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ V_2 @>>> 0 \\ @VVV @VVV @VVV \\ U_1 ⊗ (V_2 / U_2) @>>> V_1 ⊗ (V_2 / U_2) @>>> (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2) @>>> 0 \\ @VVV @VVV @VVV \\ 0 @. 0 @. 0 @. \end{CD} $$ So let’s use the following result:

Lemma. Let $R$ be a ring and consider the following commutative diagram of $R$-modules with exact rows and exact columns: $$ \begin{CD} {} @. A @>β>> B @>>> 0 \\ @. @Vδ'VV @VVε'V @. \\ C @>δ>> D @>ε>> E @. {} \\ @. @VVV @VVγV @. \\ {} @. F @>>> G @. {} \end{CD} $$ The induced sequence $A ⊕ C \xrightarrow{f} D \xrightarrow{g} G$ is again exact.

Proof. It follows the exactness of the middle row and left column that $g ∘ f = 0$. Let $d ∈ \ker(f)$. We have $0 = g(d) = γε(d)$, whence $ε(d) ∈ \ker(γ) = \mathrm{im}(ε')$. There hence exists $b ∈ B$ with $ε(d) = ε'(b)$. By the surjectivity of $β$, there exists $a ∈ A$ with $b = β(a)$. Let $d' := d - δ'(a)$. We have $$ ε(d') = ε(d) - εδ'(a) = ε(d) - ε'β(a) = ε(d) - ε'(b) = ε(d) - ε(d) = 0 \,. $$ There hence exists $c ∈ C$ with $d' = δ(c)$. We have now $d - δ'(a) = d' = δ(c)$, and therefore $d = δ'(a) + δ(c) = f( (a, c) )$. This shows that the kernel of $g$ is contained in the image of $f$.

In our specific example, we find that the sequence $$ (U_1 ⊗ V_2) ⊕ (V_1 ⊗ U_2) \to V_1 ⊗ V_2 \to (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2) $$ is exact. In other words, the kernel of $V_1 ⊗ V_2 \to (V_1 / U_1) ⊗ (V_2 / U_2)$ is given by $U_1 ⊗ V_2 + V_1 ⊗ U_2$.

When $f_1$ and $f_2$ are not both surjective

If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are not both surjective then we can proceed as already explained in Martin Brandenburg’s answer: By using the factorization $$ V_1 ⊗ V_2 \to \mathrm{im}(f_1) ⊗ \mathrm{im}(f_2) \to W_1 ⊗ W_2 \,, $$ we see that the desired equality holds if and only if the homomorphism $\mathrm{im}(f_1) ⊗ \mathrm{im}(f_2) \to W_1 ⊗ W_2$ is injective. This is, for example, the case if $\mathrm{im}(f_1)$ and $W_2$ are flat, or if $W_1$ and $\mathrm{im}(f_2)$ are flat. This is in particular the case when $𝕜$ is a field, since then every $𝕜$-module is free and thus flat.

$\endgroup$
-4
$\begingroup$

The isomorphism $$ \ker (f_1\otimes f_2)=V_1\otimes \ker f_2 + \ker f_1 \otimes V_2 $$ is equivalent to the isomorphism $$ \operatorname{coker} (f_1\otimes f_2)=\operatorname{coker} f_1\otimes \operatorname{coker} f_2, $$ since for any ideals $I,J\subset R$ we have $$ R/(I+J)=R/I\otimes R/J $$

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is not a correct argument. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 12, 2017 at 11:37

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.